Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2007, 4:41 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Such an argument challenges what the Solicitor General aptly describes as “the very core of Congress’s power under the Spending Clause and the Appropriations Clause to specify the criteria under which funds in the treasury will be paid out and spent. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
It undermines a core principle of Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 8:29 am
The core of the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 8:29 am
The core of the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:52 am
District Court Judge James V. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
Bolinger, et al v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:21 am
Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc et al – United States District Court – District of South Carolina – October 18th, 2019) involves a products liability case involved a CORE Bioflex athletic cup, manufactured by the defendant Shock Doctor and sold by the defendant Dick’s Sporting Goods. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
More specifically it is a reminder that the orthodox structures for the allocation of liability within and among enterprises, and between enterprises and their owners, is only as powerful as the core organizing principles on which they are based. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 8:23 am
" State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:22 pm
Northwest Environmental Defense Center, argued this morning in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:29 pm
United States has implications that go far beyond its impact on the 2024 presidential election. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 12:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
United States, and, of course, NFIB v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:17 am
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, a recent cert. petition that asks the Court to decide whether states can protect the right of unions to picket on private property even when a business owner, the property owner, doesn’t want them there; the Justices are scheduled to consider the case at their June 6 Conference. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Cases that might be particularly well-suited to a historian's perspective include United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
In light of the Supreme Court's focus in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 9:03 am
In her concurrence last term in United States v. [read post]
