Search for: "United States v. Douglas" Results 561 - 580 of 1,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:12 pm
Zywicki of George Mason University School of Law, and Judge Douglas Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as the moderator. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Matthew Forys
The Supreme Court upheld the free speech rights of state and local public-sector workers in Janus v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Williams (1992); when a prosecutor has not "seriously misstated the applicable law," United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
  And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, Plaintiff also brought a variety of state-law claims against the Division, his supervisors, and certain coworkers.The United Stated District Court granted summary judgment to Division on all of Plaintiff’s federal claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, Plaintiff also brought a variety of state-law claims against the Division, his supervisors, and certain coworkers.The United Stated District Court granted summary judgment to Division on all of Plaintiff’s federal claims. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:34 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
United States, U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” It appeared that their lawyer, Professor Douglas Laycock, was attempting to thread the needle between existing case law, like Marsh v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]