Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 561 - 580
of 774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2011, 7:11 am
United States, and its two Eighth Amendment juvenile life-without-parole cases, Miller v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm
As previously reported here, the United States Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in the case of Kiobel v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
United States, continued to keep Court watchers and commentators busy yesterday. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors, and not of the Attorney-General's department or the Australian Government] The decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum is remarkable for a number a reasons. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
The Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) creates federal jurisdiction over “any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
In Sarei v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
The second is the appointment of a brand new team member, to cover developments in the United States -- the highly respected (despite the fact that he's a friend of the IPKat) Professor David C. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Section 1350 provides: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
The first was Freeman v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am
For this blog’s Academic round-up, Amanda Frost examines some of the academic commentary on the Fourth Amendment’s applicability to GPS surveillance, an issue the Court will take up in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
Goodyear, Citizens United, Walmart v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
Highlights this week included: Samsung loses Dutch case against Apple over 3G patents as court gives meaning to FRAND (FOSS Patents) (EPLAW) Australia: Samsung appeals, retaliates, in patent war with Apple (Patentology) (ipwars.com) Supreme Court of Canada: Hyperlinking is not publication: Crookes v. [read post]
