Search for: "United States v. Ginsburg"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 8:28 am
Justice Ginsburg announced the final opinion of the day for a unanimous Court in Astrue v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 1:37 am
United States"The U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:26 am
United States, holding that Petitioner William Freeman could move for a sentence reduction because of retroactive amendments to the crack guidelines.In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:32 am
United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:44 pm
Record-Eagle) reports that Justice Ginsburg has returned from her visit to Egypt and Tunisia, a trip that was sponsored by the State Department. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:17 pm
Often, the Court will divide the time for arguments to allow other interested parties, such as the United States or a state to present their interests–sometimes without the party’s consent, such as in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
United States, __ U.S. __, 131 S. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
The United States Supreme Court released a 183 page opinion today in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:16 pm
United States, May 18, 2015, 9-0. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
Doctrinally, Bank Markazi’s argument was based on a 19th Century precedent, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
In Carr v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
United States No. 08-876, Black v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:02 am
United States, No. 09-1533. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
The United States Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:29 am
The United States Supreme Court issued three decisions today, none with major implications.In Puerto Rico v. [read post]
