Search for: "United States v. Jacobs"
Results 561 - 580
of 932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
For more information of the historical origins of section 60(2), see a beast of a judgment from Jacob LJ in Grimme Landmaschinefabrik BmbH v Scott [2010] EWCA Civ 1110. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
I commend the men and women of my Office, the United States Attorney for the Southern District and the FBI for the cooperation in this case. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
The New York Times on November 18, 2011 released the following: "PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, JANICE K. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
The New York Times on November 18, 2011 released the following: "PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, JANICE K. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Cohen as income to the New York State tax authorities. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Case Number: 15-cv-01573 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Date Filed: September 28, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 24, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-138 SEC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
United States and argues that “the lopsided win illustrates the need for a federal statute defining the default mens rea (guilty mind) to be proven in criminal cases. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am
Their legal counsel Jacob Rogers, said the removal was the result of an overreach of U.S. copyright law but believes that they have no other option than to comply saying “Today, in an unfortunate example of the overreach of the United States’ current copyright law, the Wikimedia Foundation removed the Dutch-language text of The Diary of a Young Girl” adding “We took this action to comply with the United… [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
The first case in the United States was Jacobs v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
If opinions from the Lone Star State's highest court such as the one just handed down in Scripps NP Operating LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:27 am
United States, 76 Fed.Cl. 570, 591 (2007). [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
United States, 200 U. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
Travelling around in cyberspace, and covering as much ground as Kingsley, is Katfriend Miri Frankel who, having only just penned a guest post for PatLit on the SHIELD anti-troll draft bill in the United States, popped up in quite a different area of IP with "Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Copyright Expiration Date", here. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
They lashed out against other units and the government. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:15 am
§1350, ALLOWS COURTS TO RECOGNIZE A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW OF NATIONS OCCURRING WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF A SOVEREIGN OTHER THAN THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
