Search for: "United States v. Jay" Results 561 - 580 of 737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
That decision was accompanied by a stinging dissent by Judge Jay Bybee and four of his colleagues, who argued that the much-ballyhooed panel decision represented “a clear misstatement of law,” “neglect[ing] or overlook[ing] critical cases by the Supreme Court and by our court making clear that when we are reviewing decisions about who may be admitted into the United States, we must defer to the judgment of the political branches. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 9:23 am by WSLL
Stat. 12-8-301(a) prohibits liability under municipal ordinances, is the statute unconstitutional as violative of the equal protection provisions of the United States Constitution and the Wyoming Constitution. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States The Transparency Project highlights new laws focusing on press freedom presented in the recent President’s View number 18. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term Commencing March 4, 1877 1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  He would have lost anyway, because Dinkins v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
United States The libel action by former Sheriff Joe Arpaio against CNN, Rolling Stone and the Huffington Post has been dismissed by a US District Court. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
United States A judge has ruled that Rep. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
Baroness Jay of Paddington asked Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they had made of recent legislation on assisted dying in North America; and whether those laws provide an appropriate basis for legislation in England and Wales. (9 March 2017). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
In the ten years that followed there were approximately thirty outbreaks recorded in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by James Romoser
When we asked it to name three noteworthy opinions of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Question #11), it started off strong: It identified (and correctly summarized) her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
” “FDR did not hesitate long over a 1937 Supreme Court opinion (United States v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
On the same day Jay J granted a harassment injunction to three judges in the case of Foskett v Kinsley. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
United States President Biden has signed an Executive Order implementing an EU-US data privacy framework for transferring data. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]