Search for: "United States v. Lee" Results 561 - 580 of 2,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 19-8844. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act  §§ 301-306). [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am by Charles Davis
Kavanaugh’s views on that subject can best be inferred from an opinion he wrote shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:58 am by Eric Goldman
Lewis’ lawyer is Andrew Lee Martin of Colorado, a/k/a “drewmesq@aol.com. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:45 pm by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Northern District of Illinois – July 9th, 2019) involves a premises liability claim. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Robert Loeb, Sarah Grant
 The majority opinion, after 14 pages of opining how the ATS does not apply to human rights violations occurring outside the United States, added: “[o]n these facts, all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:45 am by Amy Howe
[Editor’s note: An earlier version  of this post ran on February 5, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:58 am by Taryn Rucinski
Journal of the Supreme Court of the United States The Journal of the Supreme Court of the United States contains the “official minutes” of the Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) (friend's apartment); United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
The Board found that the phrase is a common expression of patriotism, affection, or affiliation with the United States of America that will not be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am by MBettman
“Therefore, this court and the United States Supreme Court agree that statutes of repose are to be read as enacted and not with an intent to circumvent legislatively imposed time limits. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:49 am
" The Court noted that the facts in State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:49 am
" The Court noted that the facts in State v. [read post]