Search for: "United States v. Lee" Results 561 - 580 of 2,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2011, 6:07 pm by David R. Papke
Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 74 (1972), that no fundamental right to housing exists under the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 3:50 pm by Mark Walsh
Demonstrators on each side of United States v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:59 am
For a United States court to do so was anathema to the principles underlying the First Amendment. [read post]
Of Lee Cnty., 38 F.3d 1184, 1187-88 (11th Cir. 1994) (citing Town of Hallie v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:55 am by Nicandro Iannacci
It was on this day in 1965 that the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark case about contraception use by married couples that laid the groundwork for a constitutional “right to privacy” in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed, the Supreme Court had considered section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
In The Intercept, Lee Fang takes issue with Justice Anthony Kennedy’s recent refusal to respond to Fang’s request for a comment on Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
The moving defendant’s burden is to demonstrate that the act or acts of which the plaintiff complains were taken ‘in furtherance of the defendant’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue,’ as defined in the statute. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
Another change was the introduction of a clause allowing the intelligence community to obtain an emergency exception to spy within the United States on a “non-United States person” for 72 hours—without any court order. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
While the criminal charges were dismissed due to the crimes being time-barred, the prosecutor still requested the Pesaro judge to issue a confiscation order for the bronze, based on Italian cultural heritage law.[14] While the Getty Trust opposed this order, in 2019 the Court of Cassation confirmed it, thus making it final under Italian law.[15] Legal Issues and the ECtHR Judgement In order to obtain the actual return of the statue, the Pesaro prosecutor had to seek the recognition and enforcement… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Lee v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm by Priscilla Smith
S 2000bb(b) (1).[3] Smith, 494 U.S. at 887 (equating evaluation of centrality with, inter alia, substantiality) (citing United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
  And at ISCOTUSnow, Edward Lee predicts the winners in both Zivotofsky and the other oral argument yesterday, Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]