Search for: "United States v. Mason" Results 561 - 580 of 602
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
Two-Tier Partnership Tracks at AmLaw 200 Law Firms: Theory and Evidence Ruth Mason, Prospects for a Multilateral Treaty Between the United States and the European Union David Reiss, Subprime Standardization: How Rating Agencies Allow Predatory Lending to Flourish in the Secondary Mortgage Market and How They Can Be Stopped Michael Woronoff & Jonathan Rosen, Understanding Anti-Dilution Provisions in Convertible Securities [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
Mukasey, No. 06-2477 "In order to establish eligibility for relief based exclusively on activities undertaken after his arrival in the United States, an alien must make some showing that authorities in his country of nationality are: 1) aware of his activities; or 2) likely to become aware of his activities. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
The Masons contend the statute violates the guarantees of equalprotection of the laws found in the constitutions of the United States andGeorgia. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 4:13 pm
On Wednesday evening, CAAF will hear oral argument in the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
"The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws and not of men. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:16 pm
It is not often that a court precludes the government from using a cache of firearms, including an assault rifle, and 16,000 rounds of ammunition in a drug trafficking case, but in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:49 am
As new symptoms arise, the fable taught that lawmakers (or regulators) are justified in revisiting the diagnosis, unfettered by judicial interference or constitutional constraint.In the Supreme Court's 1957 majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 7:35 am
Washington Education Association decision, the United States Supreme Court unanimously enforced a Washington... [read post]