Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 561 - 580 of 1,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am by James Coppess
Second, although the matter has not been in any doubt since 1984’s Minnesota Board for Community Colleges v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Dorsey & Whitney, 88 F.3d 536 (8th Cir. 1996) — 88_f.3d_536 United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:28 pm by Jason Rantanen
Research in Motion, Ltd. or transnational deals to sell inventions in the United States as in Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:18 am by Orin Kerr
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:18 am by Thompson & Knight LLP
               On January 16, 2015, the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis (“Debtor”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota likely to halt hundreds of claims of clergy sexual abuse. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:18 am by Thompson & Knight LLP
               On January 16, 2015, the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis (“Debtor”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota likely to halt hundreds of claims of clergy sexual abuse. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm by Mark Walsh
Moving along, Roberts announces that he has the opinion in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a case about tribal fishing rights, the judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided court. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Linda A. Kerns
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion regarding a Minnesota state statute that retroactively revokes designations of spouses of beneficiaries of life insurance policies upon divorce. [read post]