Search for: "United States v. Rhodes" Results 561 - 580 of 675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Such decisions, along with the decision by Rhode Island to boycott the Convention entirely, significantly enhanced the prospects of cohesion among the disproportionately pro-nationalist delegates who did show up. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am by Emma Snell
”  Lawyer for Rhodes, Philip Linder, however, argued that Rhodes and his subordinates had never planned an attack against the government on Jan. 6. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:43 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] I am writing this on Friday in preparation for posting on Wednesday. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
There are 3,140 counties in the United State and Iowa has 99 counties. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Calk had hoped then-President Trump would name him to a powerful government post, including treasury secretary, defense secretary, or ambassador to France or the United Kingdom. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 10:01 am by Amy Howe
United States came as part of a list of orders released from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Feb. 28. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:43 am by Erin Miller
He filed more than 400 petitions, motions, and briefs in the Supreme Court of the United States, and orally argued 13 cases there, including Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm by David Kopel
Cooley, General Principles of Constitutional Law 271 (2d ed. 1891) (discussing the implicit right to train with weapons)); United States v. [read post]