Search for: "United States v. Sharpe" Results 561 - 580 of 1,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2017, 12:26 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  Brady material gets its name from the landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision of Brady v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Leading nineteenth century legal thinkers in the United States shared this view of the suspension clause. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am by Scott R. Anderson, Yishai Schwartz
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The case since has settled.Computer Fraud and Abuse ActThe most significant CFAA case of the past several years has been United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:25 pm by Cheryl Beise
Hospira, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2017-1115, 26 October 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It’s disturbing, to say the least.Perhaps the United States will never be Gilead. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
”  Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Euan Sinclair
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Articles cited herein without stated authors are those of the author of this article—Ken Chasse.) [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
In late July 1974, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in United States v. [read post]