Search for: "United States v. Stamps"
Results 561 - 580
of 901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am
’ However, the Dictionary Act, 1 U.S Code § 1, which defines terms used in the United States Code `unless the context indicates otherwise,’ specifies that the word `person’ includes `corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
The sad thing about this book is that it reflects the notion that the dialogue over the intellectual commons is an exclusively United States affair, which is by and large true. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 4:35 am
The papers were posted by the court to the United States on October 19, 2011. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:15 pm
The fact that the number of people on food stamps has increased does indeed reflect badly on the country's economic state. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
United States, the Rehnquist court wrote: In United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 4:20 pm
The DOJ filed the case, United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
However, in the last fifty years, the United States has removed those values of relying on one’s self and neighbors. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:27 am
United States Postal Serv., 456 F.3d 1270, 1274 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:12 am
KSR v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
Sadly, the United States also experimented with government-imposed racial labeling. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:37 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:06 am
Cox v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:06 am
Cox v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
(SW v United Kingdom) The notion that a person’s “physical and psychological integrity” is part of the private life protected by Article 8 ECHR, coupled with the right to dignity under Article 1 of the Charter of Fundamental rights, won the day in A & Others, R(on the application of) v East Sussex County Council where disabled individuals in a care home asserted their right to be lifted in an appropriate manner. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:39 pm
When they did that, they gave him an I-94 card (arrival/departure card) and stamped it showing that he was paroled into the United States under INA 212(d)(5) for purposes of pursuing his asylum claim. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:35 am
According to Morrison, this forbearance policy barred his conviction under the CCTA because that statute provides that, in order for a federal prosecution to lie, the state in which the allegedly contraband cigarettes are found must “require” tax stamps to be placed on cigarettes. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
