Search for: "United States v. State of NY"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 9:41 am
Moore, 666 F.3d 313, 320 (4th Cir. 2012); United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 12:25 am
In Incantalupo v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:55 pm
Wade,” Ruth Marcus, Washington Post op-ed, 4/24/20 NY Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 3:19 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Permanent Mission of India to United Nations v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Crawford, P.C., Roosevelt, NY, for petitioner.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Judith N. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Mason, 527 F.3d 252, 255 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:05 am
” “Debtors ultimately defaulted on their loan obligations and filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
In Katz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
CPL 240.20(1)(h) requires the prosecutor disclose "Anything required to be disclosed, prior to trial, to the defendant by the prosecutor, pursuant to the constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 7:50 pm
Levasseur v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:55 am
NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORP., ET AL., No. 08-CV-377 (JFB) (MLO);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
Contrary to Reich's arguments, the fact that it was purportedly not the attorney of record at the time of a hearing before the United States Bankruptcy Court to determine whether the particular asset at issue qualified as an exemption, is not dispositive of the existence of an attorney-client relationship during the period of the alleged negligence. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:09 am
The United States Supreme Court has moved a giant leap forward in LGBTQ+ rights with the latest opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:53 am
In Sharp v Ferrante Law Firm, 2023 NY Slip Op 05383 [220 AD3d 587], October 24, 2023the Appellate Division, First Department found that there was no collateral estoppel, but nevertheless, the case was untimely. [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 1:08 pm
Law as employees based in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:54 am
Though perhaps illogical, the verdicts may stand ( see, United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
” Fast forward to 2014, after the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. [read post]
