Search for: "United States v. Tam"
Results 561 - 580
of 917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
The United States Supreme Court, the least productive court in the nation, is back on summer recess until October. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 2:17 pm
USA ex rel Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro NY, Inc. v Westchester County, 2016 WL 3945679 (SDNY 7/18/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Discrimination, FHA [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 1:17 pm
” Becker’s Hospital Review, “20 things to know about the Anti-Kickback Statute,” September 5, 2014.Amidst these ever growing AKS cases, I came across a remarkable case, United States ex rel Ruscher v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 1:17 pm
” Becker’s Hospital Review, “20 things to know about the Anti-Kickback Statute,” September 5, 2014.Amidst these ever growing AKS cases, I came across a remarkable case, United States ex rel Ruscher v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:55 am
See United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
Brunetti Defending the Thought We HateAs I predicted back in January, the United States Supreme Court today invalidated that portion of the Lanham Act 15 U.S. [read post]
20 May 2012, 8:11 pm
United States, 549 U.S. 457 (2007), to reject the view, found in Findley, that a "relator could provide nothing new after a public disclosure. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
The United States and State of Wisconsin intervened and joined the case as parties. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
Tam, 137 S. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:56 am
” The case is US ex. rel Lisitza v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:27 am
After the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Universal Health Servs. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:27 am
After the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Universal Health Servs. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The 1938 ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
The firm served as relator counsel in United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 1:02 pm
Under the qui tam provisions, a private party can file an action on behalf of the United States and receive a portion of the recovery. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
26 May 2022, 11:30 am
The qui tam case is captioned United States, et al. ex rel. [read post]
