Search for: "United States v. The Commissioner" Results 561 - 580 of 3,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has just issued a ruling with potentially far-reaching consequences for women seeking asylum in the United States.The petitioner in the case, Perdomo v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm by Mark Walsh
It’s the last two-week argument session of the Term, and today is the biggest of the last group of cases: United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
This committee is formed pursuant to article 17 of the Convention and it operates under the auspices of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 2:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appellants, SC and CB (“the adult appellants”), SC’s three youngest children and CB’s five children (“the child appellants”), brought proceedings against the respondents, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the Lords Commissioners of HM Treasury, and the Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
It is not difficult to guess what part of the second paragraph of the opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am by Rosalind English
The specific test under the ECHR for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits is set out in Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, a decision of the Strasbourg Grand Chamber. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:45 am
Goodson challenged the fine, claiming it violated their right to free speech guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the New Jersey Constitution. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:41 pm by WIMS
      An association and several individuals who regularly use the Trail for recreating and hunting, and who support wildlife conservation (Scarborough Citizens) brought suit against the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and its Northeast Regional Director, as well as the Governor of Maine and the Commissioners of the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (IFW) and Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:50 am by Jon Hyman
Because Hutchinson was a public employee proceeding under the United States Constitution, Title VII did not define the court’s limits. [read post]