Search for: "United States v. Vermont" Results 561 - 580 of 875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
City of Burlington 15-156Issue: Whether the Federal Aviation Act preempts all state and local general land-use regulation aimed at addressing off-site airport noise, as the Vermont Supreme Court and other state high courts have held, or whether it preempts only those state and local general land-use regulations that conflict with federal law or intrude into a preempted field in their scope and effect, as the Second Circuit and several other federal courts of… [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-632, Turner v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am by Alexandra Hamilton
The United States’ court system has a clear hierarchy, and lower courts are obliged to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 5:45 pm by Pamela Wolf
The legislation would clarify also that when states take action to address forced arbitration, like Vermont and other states have tried to do, federal law should not interfere. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:12 pm by Andrew Delaney
 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
From 2001 to 2004, Olson was, unsurprisingly, Solicitor General of the United States following his victory in Bush v Gore which permitted President Bush to take office. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:01 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
His execution by legal injection became the 1,268th recorded execution in the United States since 1976. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by Daniel Richardson
  The trial court ordered all of the equipment off the road and found that the denial of the request to repair and remove by the Town constituted discriminatory treatment and violated Petitioner’s constitutional rights to equal protection under both the United States and Vermont Constitutions. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:12 am
  Some of these states (e.g., Connecticut, Maine, New York, California, Rhode Island and Vermont) sided with Deseret's opponents and argued that CO2 is already subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am by Woodrow Pollack
The district court agreed because there had been no "injury-in-fact" to the United States. [read post]