Search for: "Unknown Defendants 1 -10" Results 561 - 580 of 1,496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Rachael Hanna
§ 2000bb-1 (against all defendants) State secrets privilege; qualified immunity (agent defendants only) District court dismissed in favor of all defendants on grounds of state secrets privilege. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:33 pm
It is important to remember that Johnson is, as with all U.S. defendants, innocent until proven otherwise. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:18 pm by Meyers Nave
In Los Angeles Unified School District, the Supreme Court held that a contractor does not need to show fraudulent intent in order to recover for extra work or expenses necessitated by unknown conditions. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Turning now to fair use, this requires the defendant to prove use (1) other than as a mark, (2) in a descriptive sense, and (3) in good faith. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
  As to personal jurisdiction, the Court noted that “to assert personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant, two conditions must be satisfied: (1) the exercise of jurisdiction must be authorized under the state’s long-arm statute [Md. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:45 pm
However, the application of the mitigating rules is untested, for obvious reasons, which presents an unknown risk to litigants. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:06 pm by Apostolos Anthimos
Article 215 Para 2 of the Greek Code of Civil Procedure reads as follows: … the claim is served to the defendant within a term of 30 days after filing; if the defendant resides abroad or is of unknown residence, the claim is served within 60 days after filing. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
  In Tomasik, Court directed the trial court to disclose to the defendant the March 26, 2003 report authored by Timothy Zwart of Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services and the March 1, 2003 form authored by Denise Joseph-Enders. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:23 pm by NL
CPR 55(1), the modern form, is also quite specific – these are claims for ‘recovery of possession of land’ (55(1)(a)) or ‘recovery of land’ against trespassers (55(1)(b)). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm by Bexis
Dec. 15, 2011), the moving defendants all received summary judgment, so it was just the best of times. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lexmark has crept into §43(a)(1)(A) via false endorsement; it will be interesting to see whether courts recognize that other trademark claims are likewise subject to a proximate cause requirement by that logic. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:46 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
To discuss your case in more detail, do not hesitate to contact us at 1-877-499-HURT (4878) or contact us online today. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:44 pm by Josephine Liu
  Plaintiff Patrick Burrows, who was a Winn-Dixie employee, claimed that an unknown person used his compromised PII to file a false tax return under his name, leaving him unable to collect his tax refund. [read post]