Search for: "Unknown Persons and Interested Parties"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,794
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2015, 9:02 am
There are many unknowns in this nascent field that undoubtedly will be fleshed out over time. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
These were, again in reverse chronological order, as follows: CBL v Person Unknown or Persons Unknown, (29 March 2011), Sharp J. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 11:20 am
Having considered the competing interests at stake, -- personal privacy versus public disclosure of matters of public interest -- the Supreme Court said "we are firmly convinced that the disclosures made by respondents in this suit are protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:14 am
Between 1985 and 1997, Harr was a party to at least 27 lawsuits in California, Arizona and Ohio. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 12:32 pm
The interest rate exceeded the disclosed average annual interest rate by 500%. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am
Electraquoted with approval a district court’s reasoning that “[t]he misappropriation of a completely anonymous face could not form the basis for a false endorsement claim, because consumers would not infer that an unknown model was ‘endorsing’ a product, as opposed to lending her image to a company for a fee. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
PADOT, SR., and MARY ANN PADOT, his wife; ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, OR AGAINST THE HEREIN N [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:20 am
The court may consider whether the requested anonymity is intended merely to avoid the annoyance and criticism that may attend any litigation or is to preserve privacy in a sensitive and highly personal matter; whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the requesting party or to innocent nonparties; the ages of the persons whose privacy interests are sought to be protected; whether the action is against a governmental or private… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:19 am
Personally, I know few lawyers who want people on a jury who blindly or baldly maintain suppositions as fact. [read post]
If IPSO is a tough regulator then why is it so soft on intrusions into grief and shock? – Paul Wragg
19 Jul 2022, 4:43 pm
Why would a newspaper publish a story about someone unknown? [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am
Back in March, exercising rare concern for those exploited by the super-rich, the government issued an ‘urgent call for evidence’ that promised, based upon ‘third party and anecdotal evidence’ [42], ‘quick and effective’ action against Strategic Litigation against Public Participation (“SLAPPs”). [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 11:53 am
Moreover, the institution of off-duty details serves the public interest. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Figueroa, the Second Circuit found that Title III allowed for the interception of conversations of “others as yet unknown,” (i.e., unknown third parties) and that allowance “d[id] not render a statute [] unconstitutional on its face as authorizing a general warrant. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:56 am
But apart from that, two domestic cases also touch upon some interesting features of human rights law. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:19 am
As we previously reported, EFF is representing Respublika—a longtime target of Kazakhstan intimidation and persecution because of its investigative reporting on President Nursultan Nazarbayev’s regime—which has been dragged as a non-party into a CFAA lawsuit Kazakhstan filed in federal court in New York against unnamed and unknown hackers Kazakhstan believes broke into its email system. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:36 am
It applies to both U.S. citizens (wherever they are located) and to foreign persons acting in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
Howey Co., which states that a security is an investment contract in which a person 1) invests their money; 2) in a common enterprise; 3) with an expectation of profits; 4) based on the efforts of the promoter or a third party. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:50 pm
While this means you’ll have to move out, it also provides a clean slate for both parties to start anew, financially and personally. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:07 am
Be that as it may, the case, and others like it, give the lie to the idea that the encryption debate stacks law enforcement and intelligence interests, on the one hand, against personal privacy and security interests, on the other. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 7:59 am
I refused to give in, and by providing substantial compliance and best interest of the children evidence, the case was reopened. [read post]
