Search for: "VIKRAM AMAR"
Results 561 - 580
of 651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2019, 4:17 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram David Amar notes that “August 3 marks Stephen Breyer’s completion of 25 years of service as a justice. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
Inquires about possible visiting positions should be submitted separately to Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Vikram Amar, at vdamar@ucdavis.edu. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 8:44 am
Davis associate dean Vikram Amar similarly discuss the Justice’s career and delve a bit into his personality; Barnhart also discusses his new biography in an interview with the Chicago Tribune. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
UPDATE: For a critical take on Justice Kagan's approach to stare decisis, see this recent piece by Illinois Law Dean Vikram David Amar. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar responds to an op-ed by Michael McConnell in the Wall Street Journal (subscription required) on May 24 which criticized “liberal law professors” who support the individual mandate. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:19 am
In his column for Verdict, Vikram Amar considers the broader implications of the decision and concludes that “[o]nly time will tell whether the schism between the majority and the dissenters in Arlington portends bigger battles over Chevron deference, one of the main pillars of modern administrative law. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
In an op-ed for the San Francisco Chronicle, Vikram Amar contends that if the Ninth Circuit “affirm[s] [District Judge Vaughn] Walker’s ruling that there is a federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage and strike[s] down Prop. 8, the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
” At Verdict, Vikram David Amar discusses the methodological and procedural issues that the Court will face in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
Vikram D. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As Dean Vikram Amar explained in an excellent September 2018 column here on Verdict, legal uncertainties abound. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:01 pm
My Verdict co-columnist Vikram David Amar recently addressed the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar reviews Tuesday’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
As Vikram Amar, Akhil Amar, and Stephen Calabresi (a co-Founder of the Federalist Society) put it in their striking brief: “Miserably. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
See Sanford Levinson, Political Party and Senatorial Succession: A Response to Vikram Amar on How to Best Interpret the Seventeenth Amendment, 35 Hast. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
" Merits or Non-Merits DecisionsProfessor Vikram Amar explains in a blog post, that these summary dispositions, are based "merely on the certiorari-stage briefs, without the benefit of arguments or merits briefings. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram Amar and Alan Brownstein weigh in on the free-speech claims raised in the case, asserting that “the Court—to this point—has not done a very comprehensive job in creating compelled speech doctrine,” and that what they view as the relevant factors “militate strongly against the baker’s compelled speech claim. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar explores “how the Justices have gotten to the point where neither wing of the Court seems remotely open to, or trustful of, the other on these matters,” while Esther J. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar concurs with other commentators who have suggested that Jeffrey Toobin’s behind-the-scenes account of Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
” At Verdict, Vikram David Amar and Alan Brownstein argue that, even if the Proposition 8 case does reach the Court, “it is still quite unclear … whether the Court will rule on the merits—or instead dismiss the appeal on procedural grounds.” Also at Verdict, Julie Hilden explains why, in her view, the Court is likely to grant cert. to reverse a recent decision by the Third Circuit in an indecency case arising out of Janet Jackson’s… [read post]
