Search for: "Vikram Amar"
Results 561 - 580
of 641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
Vikram D. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As Dean Vikram Amar explained in an excellent September 2018 column here on Verdict, legal uncertainties abound. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:01 pm
My Verdict co-columnist Vikram David Amar recently addressed the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar reviews Tuesday’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
As Vikram Amar, Akhil Amar, and Stephen Calabresi (a co-Founder of the Federalist Society) put it in their striking brief: “Miserably. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
See Sanford Levinson, Political Party and Senatorial Succession: A Response to Vikram Amar on How to Best Interpret the Seventeenth Amendment, 35 Hast. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
" Merits or Non-Merits DecisionsProfessor Vikram Amar explains in a blog post, that these summary dispositions, are based "merely on the certiorari-stage briefs, without the benefit of arguments or merits briefings. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
” At Verdict, Vikram David Amar and Alan Brownstein argue that, even if the Proposition 8 case does reach the Court, “it is still quite unclear … whether the Court will rule on the merits—or instead dismiss the appeal on procedural grounds.” Also at Verdict, Julie Hilden explains why, in her view, the Court is likely to grant cert. to reverse a recent decision by the Third Circuit in an indecency case arising out of Janet Jackson’s… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am
” Additional commentary comes from Vikram David Amar and Alan Brownstein at Justia’s Verdict blog, who remark that “what may be most memorable and important in this opinion is not the analytic moves it makes, but the tone it employs and the message about respect, civility, and dignity it tries to send. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars – Bruce Ackerman, Vikram Amar, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, and Adam Winkler – demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:29 am
Roeca, 2009 president of The Bar Association of San Francisco05/26/09 Los Angeles Times, "You Just Can't Change Marriage", by Andrew Pugno, attorney for Yes on 8 / ProtectMarriage.com05/27/09 Los Angeles Times, comments by Goodwin Liu, Vikram Amar, Jesse H. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Also at Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the possible procedural defects in Fisher v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram Amar and Alan Brownstein weigh in on the free-speech claims raised in the case, asserting that “the Court—to this point—has not done a very comprehensive job in creating compelled speech doctrine,” and that what they view as the relevant factors “militate strongly against the baker’s compelled speech claim. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram David Amar maintains that “[t]his week’s decision by Justice Samuel Alito … to leave undisturbed the congressional districting ruling last month by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court … is a helpful reminder of the importance of state courts and state constitutions in safeguarding American democracy. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar explores “how the Justices have gotten to the point where neither wing of the Court seems remotely open to, or trustful of, the other on these matters,” while Esther J. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar concurs with other commentators who have suggested that Jeffrey Toobin’s behind-the-scenes account of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
At VERDICT, Vikram Amar analyzes the issues in M.B.Z. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
Amar of the UC Davis School of Law, Jesse H. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram David Amar discusses the court’s approach to precedent in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
