Search for: "Vote v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 9,475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2016, 12:03 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In addition, the Respondent paid taxes and voted in the United States and traveled on a United States passport. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:55 pm by Eva Arevuo
Related articles LA City Council to Vote on Citizens United Declaration (blogs.wsj.com) Los Angeles City Council Votes Unanimously: It’s WE the PEOPLE (dailykos.com) The Road to Citizens United (legallyeasy.rocketlawyer.com) {lang: 'ar'} [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:38 am by Eric Goldman
This summer, President Trump issued a series of brazenly censorial executive orders trying to kick TikTok and WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:32 am
Continuing its somewhat puzzling approach (and voting paterns) in ACCA cases, the Supreme Court today in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am by The Federalist Society
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by Richard Hasen
The 2006 Amendments to the Voting Rights Act passed the United States Senate by a vote of 98-0 and passed the House 390-33, but there was more intrigue than the lopsided numbers suggest. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:24 pm by The Federalist Society
In an opinion delivered by Justice Kagan, the Court held by a vote of 8-1 that the United States had indeed waived sovereign immunity and that the plaintiff did have prudential standing to challenge the government placement of land into trust for use by Indian tribes. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:33 pm by Unknown
H.R.4637 - To sever United States Government relations with the Creek Nation of Oklahoma until such time as the Creek Nation of Oklahoma restores full Tribal citizenship to the Creek Freedmen disenfranchised in the October 6, 1979, Creek Nation vote and fulfills all its treaty obligations with the Government of the United States, and for other purposes. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:48 am by Erin Miller
United States, Schwab v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:32 am
Denedo's original court-martial conviction, the court also could hear a coram nobis appeal, because under United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 1:03 pm by David S. Cohen
  What I want to point to in this post is a passage from United States v. [read post]