Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., in Re" Results 561 - 580 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
I think such closed-mindedness is unfortunate and counterproductive, and if we don’t stop to understand what others are saying—even when we don’t like it—we’re doomed forever to talk past each other. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
(Class 99) District Court Delaware: Grant of preliminary injunction does not establish objective recklessness for wilfulness: Cordis Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:35 am by Bob Ambrogi
v=eTgdQYdH2z4&t=28s Target customer: Mediators, neutrals, and ADR professionals. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat, who co-authored the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which created the CFPB. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
  For example, she wrote that “[i]t is a clearly established principle of the law of war that detention may last no longer than active hostilities. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen stayed patent case… [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
A Probate and Family Court judge ordered the father to vacate the marital home and issued temporary orders granting the mother sole custody of the child, and a date for a hearing was set. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Spicy IP), India: Supreme Court on exclusive marketing rights: (Spicy IP), Japan: First induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell patent at Kyoto University: (Competitive Info), Slovenia: Supplementary protection certificates in Slovenia: (The SPC Blog), United States: Biotech/pharma lobbying scoreboard – second quarter update – part II: (Patent Docs), United States: Ferring Pharmaceuticals argues to bring down direct purchaser suits: (Law 360), United States: Transferred… [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
(IAM) European Audio-Visual Observatory publishes paper ‘An Introduction to Music Rights for Film and Television Production’ (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) PGI/PDO applications and amendments: Redykolka cheese from Poland; Spanish meat product Jamón de Teruel; Polish cheese Wielkopolski ser smazony; Hungarian meat product Budapesti téliszalámi (Class 46) (Class 46) What is a ‘covenant not to sue’? [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Belgium - eBay wins ruling against L’Oreal in dispute over liability for counterfeit goods sold in online auctions: (Managing Intellectual Property), (Counterfeit Chic), (IPKat), (Class 46), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica) US CAFC holds that copying free software without complying with license is copyright infringement: Robert Jacobsen v… [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Governors The last hope a condemned inmate has is for a grant of clemency by the Governor. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am by Orin S. Kerr
  Investigators suspected McCarthy of distributing heroin from his home to a co-conspirator's home on Cape Cod. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
” Recall that in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:36 am by David Post
On the other hand, surely the First Amendment doesn’t prevent a president (or his press secretary) from, say, granting an exclusive interview (or providing a “leak”) to one (favored) reporter or paper or TV network and not another. [read post]