Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of"
Results 561 - 580
of 936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 8:22 am
The company’s owner told her that “in his experience, ‘[w]omen’s priorities shift when they become mothers’” and that she should consider that. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
IDT (EDTexweblog.com) District Court W D Virginia: Virginia Patent Foundation’s motion for reconsideration denied – Intervening rights still absolve GE of damages for activities before reexamination certificate issue date (Reexamination Alert) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Butamax – BP-DuPont Biofuels JV takes Gevo to court (Green Patent Blog) Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products – ALJ Gildea grants motion to terminate investigation in… [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:45 am
Let’s reserve the term “super-hero” exclusively to describe the heroes of comics published by companies that aren’t crooked word-thieves. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:45 am
Let’s reserve the term “super-hero” exclusively to describe the heroes of comics published by companies that aren’t crooked word-thieves. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission approved in a 3-2 vote final rules that require most reporting companies to provide certain climate-related information in their registration statements and annual reports filed with the SEC. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
As from 10 January 2015, the recast will replace Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cir. 2008): Limits patentable subject matter. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:10 pm
Warby J was unimpressed by Tesco’s reliance of potential reputational harm: no rational member of the public would, knowing the facts, think worse of Tesco or shun it, particularly given the historic nature of the matters ([46]). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
Richard W. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 10:29 pm
As noted by this Congressional Research Service Report from August 2016: Under the George W. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
According to the Adopting Release, a fundamental premise that underlies this rulemaking is that “[t]he de-SPAC transaction is a hybrid transaction that contains elements of both an [IPO] and [an M&A] transaction…[and] [w]hile structured as an M&A transaction, the de-SPAC transaction also is the functional equivalent of the private target company’s IPO. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:58 am
Insurance in Georgia is a matter of contract, Hurst v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
That company recorded and released one album and several singles, including the works at issue. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
IRVING W. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Garganus T. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
In its brief at the Supreme Court, the government’s primary submission is that it doesn’t matter, because the Sixteenth Amendment doesn’t require “realization” at all. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
The denial in Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:49 pm
Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 (1996) (Markman II) [...], this court in Cybor held that patent claim construction receives de novo determination on appeal, that is, review for correctness as a matter of law.Lighting Ballast Control, LLC at *6.Holding[W]e apply the principles of stare decisis, and confirm the Cybor standard of de novo review of claim construction, whereby the scope of the patent grant is reviewed as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:01 am
The dearth of questions on those matters is to be expected. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Dep't of Commerce v. [read post]
