Search for: "WELLS v. EDWARDS" Results 561 - 580 of 2,378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Jackie McDermott
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
To put the point quite vividly, a person who is unable to walk will not be able to walk by social construction, but the way that person’s capacity to walk is construed, and the extent to which any such inhibition to that capacity affects that person’s goals, ambitions and pursuits—their well-being—is largely socially constructed. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
Further, Huawei argues that the way in which members of Congress spoke about Huawei in the bill’s legislative history, as well as the fact and manner of the ban, have the effect of branding it “disloyal. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
Edward Ryan, representing the government, started arguments on AE 614, a prosecution motion to compel notice from the defense of their intent to introduce expert mental health evidence by June 1. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
India It is reported that Bangalore City Civil Court has granted an interim injunction against over forty media houses as well as social media platforms from publishing defamatory statements against BJP candidate and lawyer Tejasvi Surya. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law360 (subscription required), Edward Zelinsky looks at the recent decision in Dawson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Clearly, the implication was that someone well versed in Philosophy could, even without legal training, find his way in the discipline of law. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
 In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]