Search for: "WILLING v. U S"
Results 561 - 580
of 772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
Morton-Bentley, Rhode Island’s School Funding Challenges in Historical Context, 24 Roger Williams U. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 12:18 pm
Collection Development, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
U. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:44 pm
Now teenagers perceive the Pickwick logo as trendy and are willing to pay extra for clothes bearing its trademark. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:18 pm
Mills, 595 U. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Federal Election Comm’n, 558 U. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm
" in "Texte u. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:08 am
U. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
Such was the case in Matter of Franzese (Franzese Realty Associates), 2009 NY Slip Op 33139(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County Dec. 16, 2009), in which Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Timothy S. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
From the Framing to Today, 160 U. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Jon's article follows. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Aereo’s retransmission service and the Google Books project are cases in point. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 2:56 am
Item (f) about claim charts should be left to the way the courts apply Huawei v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:31 am
While free speech isn’t shed at the school yard gates, as the Supreme Court held in Tinker v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm
U. [read post]
