Search for: "Wait v. Second Judicial District Court"
Results 561 - 580
of 619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
Won't they happily embrace "selective incorporation" and suggest that the Second Amendment has little to do with the "ordered liberty" endorsed by Justice Cardozo in Palko v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:44 am
The district court held that the defendant was actually innocent of the sodomy charges to which he had pled guilty, but had waited too long to bring a habeas claim to set aside the conviction. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:55 am
Fourth and finally, the court observed that there is no clear means by which a U.S. judicial officer could be authorized to issue warrants for overseas searches. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Other than a couple of 11th District decisions, here and here, no Ohio court has bought into Old Chief. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:36 pm
Moreover, the district court also determined that ISW's claims were not barred by laches.MDE appealed the district court's decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 2:51 pm
In so doing, the court extended the holding of Mike Davidov Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR… [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 4:46 pm
Supreme Court case Caperton v. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
PHE v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:24 am
On Wednesday, in an opinion authored by Justice Alito, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Tenth Circuit's decision in Pearson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
By Ethan Ackerman On Dec. 23, 2008, federal District Judge Maxine Chesney issued what the defense attorneys in Hoang v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Cal. 2008) (probably the best of quite a few good federal district court drug preemption decisions in 2008); (13) Bausch v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Inst. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Instead, this Court is required to exercise its independent power of judicial review. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 8:30 am
Our local appellate court in Ventura (Second District, Division Six) can be a good place to hang out if you’re looking for a chuckle. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:40 pm
B195552 (Oct. 9, 2008), in which California's Second District Court of Appeals held that a lawsuit challenging the city's "moratorium resolution" was not ripe for judicial review. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:25 pm
First, the Court identified De Canas v. [read post]
