Search for: "Walker v. Powers"
Results 561 - 580
of 846
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
In particular, the Review Group argued that an appeal should lie only where the Appeal Court certified that the case involved a point of law of general public importance, and that the Supreme Court’s powers should be limited to pronouncing on the question of law referred; it should not have all the powers of disposal available to the Appeal Court. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
In particular, the Review Group argued that an appeal should lie only where the Appeal Court certified that the case involved a point of law of general public importance, and that the Supreme Court’s powers should be limited to pronouncing on the question of law referred; it should not have all the powers of disposal available to the Appeal Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:30 am
Arizona v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Kraemer”Keith Mayes, University of Minnesota, “Of Deacons, Panthers, and Liberation Armies: Civil Rights, Black Power and the Second Amendment,”Camille Walsh, Indiana University, “‘Taxpayer Citizenship’ and the Right to Education: 1929-1959” [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:45 pm
Walker dismissed that case, Jewel v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am
The issue in State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
Naim (1956), an error later rectified in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:35 am
Virginia and Zablocki v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am
And so, if it is a close call, here is one more reason for the Justices to grant cert. and vindicate Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision in Perry v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Just as Loving v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
Perry v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
. — After federal district court judge Vaughn Walker struck down California’s Proposition 8 as unconstitutional last August in Perry v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
For Judge Walker in Perry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy’s June 2011 opinion in Bond v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Reviews cover Enrique Krauze, Redeemers: Ideas and Power in Latin America (Harper) ("The Lost Century: The ideas that sent Latin America down the path of poverty and political instability"); Matthew Parker, The Sugar Barons: Family, Corruption, Empire, and War in the West Indies (Walker & Co.) [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Walker v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:54 am
Here is the abstract: The recent ruling in Perry v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
By contrast a judge, even one very experienced in intellectual property matters, does not have some special power of divination which leads instantly to an infallible conclusion, and no judge would claim to have such a power [though Lord Dilhorne must have come pretty close to doing so in his speech in Hensher v Restwawile]. [read post]
