Search for: "Walker v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 1,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-632, Turner v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Epstein,  The History of Public Utility Rate Regulation in the United States Supreme Court: Of Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory RatesAngela R. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
The most recent reference to the law of patents being wholly statutory are the words of Lord Walker in Synthon B.V. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
(JUSTICES: Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Walker, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, and Lord Carnwath) The post Joint Administrators of Heritable Bank plc (Respondent) v The Winding-Up Board of Landsbanki Islands hf (Appellant) (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 13 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
  The state claims that the Waller v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 6:29 am by Gilles Cuniberti
As to the specific test in State immunity cases, the Court referred to its judgment of 2001 in the similar case of Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom (no. 35763/97). [read post]