Search for: "Walsh v. Walsh" Results 561 - 580 of 1,710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2022, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
He first started sketching Supreme Court arguments in the 1977-78 term, when Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:51 pm
Prentky, Sexual Predator Laws: A Two-Decade Retrospective Mary Graw Leary, Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:00 pm by Joe Sanders
Adam Engel Appeal to Watch on the Sexual Offender Registration Issue: State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 6:21 pm
Read the Republican lawmakers' brief here: U S v Farley Amicus Brief.pdf [read post]
12 May 2021, 2:58 pm by Unknown
Department of the Interior (Fee-to-Trust; IGRA) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Walsh v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:13 pm by Olivia
 In Walsh v Badger Catholic, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on September 1, 2010, that the University of Wisconsin at Madison had acted improperly by denying funding to Badger Catholic, a Roman Catholic student group. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:16 pm
Kerr of the Associated Press has this report on today's oral arguments in the TSSAA v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:42 am by James Romoser
Alito says high court is no such thing (Casey Smith & Jessica Gresko, Associated Press) The Supreme Court is in the building — contentious rulings behind, more major cases ahead (Mark Walsh, ABA Journal) Mississippi abortion clinic braces for Supreme Court showdown over Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Walsh v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm by Thomas Hopson
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff submitted evidence establishing the reasonable value of its services (see Kwangjin Song v Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, 55 AD3d 1278 [2008]) and defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to plaintiff’s entitlement to the fees sought (see DiPlacidi v Walsh, 243 AD2d 335 [1997]; Pirro & Monsell v Freddolino, 204 AD2d 613 [1994], lv dismissed 85 NY2d 903 [1995]). [read post]