Search for: "Walter v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 897
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 447 U.S. 649, 656–657, 100 S.Ct. 2395, 2401–2402, 65 L.Ed.2d 410; United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The '564 Patent '564 Patent - meet your nemesis Claim 1 of the '564 patent entitled "Insecticidal combination effective against fleas on mammals, particularly cats and dogs" claimed the following A composition which provides small mammals with long-lasting protection against fleas, which includes, on the one hand, [fipronil] and, on the other hand, at least one ovicidal compound (B), of insect growth regulator (IGR) type, in a fluid vehicle which is acceptable to the mammal and suitable… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:35 am by Robert A. Epstein
Reading the recently unpublished (not precedential) Appellate Division matter of Connaughton v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Instead of an increase in cost per treatment or per unit cost of a service such as a doctor’s visit, it is the amount of services and the types of services being used driving medical inflation. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:29 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
"(Note: Duke Law professor emeritus and former interim dean Walter E. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Plumer instead voted for his friend, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams for President and United States Ambassador to Britain, William Rush as Vice-President, even though neither Adams nor Rush were candidates for those offices. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 10:42 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
The penalties are increased if the victim is a political figure, a concept that might surprise United States journalists who generally receive greater protection against defamation liability when writing about politicians. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm by Ilyse Schuman
On September 12, Littler Shareholder Walter Hunter outlined a number of concerns facing higher education institutions in light of recent National Labor Relations Board developments. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am by Cormac Early
In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus discusses the possibility of a constitutional amendment to overturn the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am by Walter Weber
Sadly, the United States also experimented with government-imposed racial labeling. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument  in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
(credit) Previous entries on this site have covered the Alien Tort Statute, as well as Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Charon QC
But it’s the lawyers who are dominant in business in the United States*. [read post]