Search for: "Waters v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 9,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
In Stone v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:08 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm
Schoebroek (Water Rights) United States, Puyallup Tribe of Indians, et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
A snippet:"Water is a resource for which '[o]wnership . . . is vested [collectively] in the state’s residents.' . . . [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:43 am
Circuit’s recent decision in Hoopa Valley Tribe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:56 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
United States, 247 F. 3d 1032 (2001) (en banc); John v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:00 am
The Clean Water Act (“CWA”) generally forbids discharging contaminated effluent into waters of the United States unless the discharger holds a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 7:38 am
Elsewhere, the Court also issued a three-page unpublished decision reinstating a state-led challenge to the EPA’s rule defining the “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:55 am
Texas can file original complaint in water dispute. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:17 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:40 pm
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:18 am
Ecological Rights Foundation v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 12:22 pm
The case is Guertin, et al., v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:28 am
The EPA has filed its merits brief in Sackett v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:29 am
Abu Sayyaf continues to pose a significant threat to commercial traffic in waters between the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia, prompting the Philippine government earlier this month to request additional maritime policing and domain awareness support from the United States and China. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:49 pm
The British Columbia Supreme Court in Allison v Radtke, 2014 CarswellBC 2884, 2014 BCSC 1832 expanded on this principle, stating that not only can an upper riparian owner not direct water by artificial means onto adjoining properties, they are also not permitted to alter their lands so that it increases the amount of surface water running onto a neighbour’s property. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
The case is Florida Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 6:26 am
The Court of Appeals decision July 20th in the case of Jennings Water v. [read post]
