Search for: "Watkins v. Watkins"
Results 561 - 580
of 746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2023, 7:30 am
Watkins et al. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 9:13 am
Watkins et al. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Jurata provided a quick overview of the FTC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
The second in the guest series of Brave New World posts written by Don McCombie (Latham & Watkins) for PatLit deals with jurisdiction and the Unified Patent Court. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:00 am
It certainly isn't our boom in population growth...Illinois Inevitable Disclosure OpinionMaxwell Goss published a guest column on PatentlyO about a new case in the Northern District of Illinois called Molon Motor and Coil Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Luttrell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 7:46 am
This initiative was proposed by the head of the Defense Committee of the Upper House of the Russian Parliament, Víktor Bóndarev, and the head of the Committee for the Defense of the Duma in the Lower Chamber, Vladimir Shamánov. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
In March 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court held in Salzburg v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Baze v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:31 pm
The CCA order in Skinner v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
SEC Brings SPAC Enforcement Action and Signals More to Come Posted by Adam Brenneman, Rahul Mukhi, and Jared Gerber, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Friday, August 6, 2021 Tags: IPOs, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation, SPACs Shareholder Meetings and Freedom Rides: The Story of Peck v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Corbett, 251 Or. 263 (1968) (likewise); Watkins v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:01 am
Watkin [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
Watkins decision in 1961. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:35 am
Craig Watkins' lead, that 250 figure would be significantly higher.If the numerator is tough to figure, the denominator is even more controversial. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
The nearly-annual IP Publishers and Editors Lunch, which the recession nearly killed off last year, is back again this year, thanks to the generous hospitality of the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:11 am
Thomas, who is representing himself, cited a 1987 Georgia Supreme Court case known as Cherry v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:55 pm
Garre, now chair of the appellate practice at Latham & Watkins, testified about the case at a Dec. 2 hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
