Search for: "Wells v. Lloyd" Results 561 - 580 of 647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 5:38 am by Adam Wagner
This is in the interests of public protection and therefore well within the exceptions built into Article 8 of the European Convention. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, to our list of cases in which the Court has called for the views of the Solicitor General. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm by Martin George
Disputes and the economy Litigation can be generated by economic growth as well as by retrenchment. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:32 am by David Smith
Cook v Thomas & Thomas [2010] EWCA Civ 227 This case was well describd by the Court of Appeal as “a most unfortunate and regrettable dispute”. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Lloyd also talks of the need to redact from the jury's view any charges that were entered nolle prosequi, and cites Byrd v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Lloyd also talks of the need to redact from the jury's view any charges that were entered nolle prosequi, and cites Byrd v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
Today's great success story among the sciences may well be biology. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Rosalind English
The importance attached to the objectives of extradition is well illustrated in just such a “foreign” case, recently decided by the House of Lords. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:16 am
Back in December 2008 Mr Justice Arnold delivered a major trade mark infringement and passing off judgment in Hotel Cipriani SRL and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch) (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:00 am
In evaluating the evidence, he referred to the following passage from the judgment of Goff LJ in Armagas Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:09 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Jacob, Lloyd and Stanley Burnton) today held, in [2010] EWCA Civ 82, that Novartis's appeal should be dismissed. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am by charonqc
If it is not, the inevitable review would presumably reflect that the Foreign Secretary had done everything he lawfully could in the UK to prevent publication, as well as the considerations which led the court, exercising its independent jurisdiction, in large measure to uphold the confidentiality principle in the context of [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:20 am by John Day
Martin, 305 S.C. 144, 146-47, 406 S.E.2d 372, 374 (1991) (finding a special duty for architects); Lloyd v. [read post]