Search for: "Wells v. Supervisors" Results 561 - 580 of 3,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2013, 9:26 am by Howard Friedman
However the court dismissed various other claims, including complaints of lack of office space and fund-raisers to purchase religious material for the Mormon community, as well as retaliation and defamation claims.In Catanzaro v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:11 am by Thomas Econometrics
Then in the next breath, you say, well, now these supervisors have too much discretion. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Moving for summary judgment on the Title VII claims, the employer argued that it could not be held vicariously liable for any alleged harassment by the chef because he was not a “supervisor” under Vance v Ball State Univ. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:26 am by Ron Miller
An employer that coerced an employee to work during her intended FMLA leave period and, subsequently, reassigned her based on her allegedly poor performance during that period, may well have been harmed the employee in violation of the FMLA, despite protestations that the employee received her full salary during this period and so had not “legal damages,” ruled the Eleventh Circuit in its recent decision Evans v Books-a-Million. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:53 pm by Robert P. Merten III
All three trial court rulings rely heavily on the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]