Search for: "White v. Does 1-21"
Results 561 - 580
of 902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Next question: does it matter which Board of Appeal hears your case when it comes to the distinctiveness inquiry under Article 7(1)(b)? [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 am
III, § 21). [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 7:58 am
Code § 21-5C-1(e) (2014). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
App'x 819, 820-21 (2d Cir. 2010) (applying Arizona law); Gove v. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:29 am
That is, if an employee earning $50 per hour works 21 hours, the paystub reflects $50 times 21 as equaling gross pay of $1,050. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held in Zemel v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
The Cover-Up 21. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Makes you wonder, what did the other 21% say? [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
Let me discuss this in a bit of detail. 1. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
“The negotiated rate differential lies outside the operation of the collateral source rule also because it is not primarily a benefit to the plaintiff and, to the extent it does benefit the plaintiff, it is not provided as “compensation for [the plaintiff's] injuries. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
Yesterday the Tenth Circuit heard oral arguments in Bonidy v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:46 am
100s of millions of gamers worldwide; $21 billion to US economy. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 am
Therefore, libraries that want to include ebooks in their catalogue have to sign contracts on the lending conditions with every separate rights holder.IPKat readers might also remember that in its draft White Paper [leaked by the IPKat here - by the way: a White Paper from the Commission was is expected this month: does anyone have an [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
[21] This also implies that both the parody ‘on’ and the parody ‘with’ are covered by the EU parody exception: a parody does not need to criticize or be directly in contrast or in a dialogue with the original work, as it does not need “to relate to the original work itself”. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
White (In re White), 487 F.3d 199, 205 (4th Cir.2007). [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The lawsuit against the defendant should be dismissed, for two reasons. 1. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:03 pm
EO 11246 does not affect grants, and the new EO does not impact the administration of federal grants. [read post]
