Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2017, 9:36 am
The bill is currently at the beginning of the parliamentary process, with the first reading in the House of Lords held on September 13, to be followed by a second reading scheduled for October 10. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
The Act, according to Lord McNally, represented “the end of a long and hard fought battle to reform the libel laws in England and Wales”. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
The Act, according to Lord McNally, represented “the end of a long and hard fought battle to reform the libel laws in England and Wales”. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
The Act, according to Lord McNally, represented “the end of a long and hard fought battle to reform the libel laws in England and Wales”. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:30 am
Lord Justice Neuberger saw that, to determine what would amount to an 'immaterial' variation of the invention, it would be helpful to look at the three questions set out in Improver Corpn v Remington Consumer Products Ltd. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:43 am
Those looking for further enlightenment or having a desire to debate the issue of equivalents with Lord Neuberger himself, Lords Hoffmann and Sumption, and Judges Dr. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:34 am
The panel consisted of Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:07 am
The UK Court of Appeal took this matter on earlier this summer, giving trademark holders something to chew on.The case of Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd (t/a Allen & Hanburys) v Sandoz Ltd concerned a trademark registration for an asthma inhaler, and more specifically, its color scheme. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
According to Lord Hughes (with whom Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge agree) [para 10],“It may readily be agreed that the expression “such a sign” in section 92(1)(b) refers back to the sign described in the immediately preceding paragraph (a). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am
As explained in paragraph 42 of this judgment, in paragraph 37 of Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9, Lord Hoffmann explained that the doctrine of equivalents had been developed in the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am
As explained in paragraph 42 of this judgment, in paragraph 37 of Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9, Lord Hoffmann explained that the doctrine of equivalents had been developed in the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 pm
The long-awaited judgment in Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Limited is the right decision. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
Governor Brown has called it “the Lord’s work. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm
As noted in the first post, the Supreme Court reformulated the Improver questions, originally posed by Lord Hoffmann when at first instance and subsequently further evaluated by him in the House of Lords in Kirin-Amgen, which thoroughly examined the UK approach to patent claims. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm
On Friday the Government announced that Sir Ian Burnett has been appointed as the new Lord Chief Justice, to replace the retiring Lord Thomas from the 2 October 2017. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Dicta in Regina v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
It is here - the Supreme Court's decision in Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48This is an important case about whether drugs manufactured by Actavis infringe a European patent of Lilly. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm
Secondly, the BBC objected to various wordings which they considered to be misrepresentative of their case. [read post]
