Search for: "herrmann"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2007, 10:18 am
Police said Herrmann also allegedly asked another boy to have sex with her, but could not since the boy's sister was home.Right now, Ruark said, authorities believe Herrmann had a relationship with the one student. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
Herrmann, New Jersey App. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
October 8: Herrmann will give his hour-long "book talk" about The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law at the Chicago Bar Association. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:20 am
On their 500th post to their excellent weblog. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
In-house counsel (and former Biglaw partner) Mark Herrmann explains. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
In-house counsel (and former Biglaw partner) Mark Herrmann explains. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:10 am
In-house columnist Mark Herrmann shares his thoughts on whether times have permanently changed for Biglaw firms. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:42 am
Specialization isn’t an absolute requirement for business development, according to in-house columnist Mark Herrmann. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:47 am
Following up on their own post a month ago, the dynamic defense duo at Drug & Device Law posted: A couple of weeks ago, Herrmann noted in passing that, although many big firms now sponsor blogs, none of the ten firms with the highest profits per partner (that much-despised, but oft-cited metric) do. ... [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:55 am
Once again, Mark Herrmann offers a reason for the occasional visit to Above the Law, in contrast to its other columnists who plumb the depths of puddles. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Mark Herrmann writes: So the world seems to agree: The super-rich firms will become even more superbly rich, and the merely rich firms will lose ground. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:45 am
Between Mark Herrmann's thoughts on how he, as an inside guy, perceives the old elevator pitch, and Kevin O'Keefe's advice that one's LinkedIn summary ought to be one's elevator pitch, it got me thinking about it. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Herrmann, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:11 am
Levine: The New York Times (quoting (among others) Herrmann); AmLaw (quoting (among others) Bexis); the Washington Post (quoting (among others) Herrmann); the Wall Street Journal (subscription only) here, here, and here (not quoting us at all); the Philadelphia Inquirer (ditto); USA Today (ditto); LA Times (ditto).There'll be more, but that's enough to keep us busy for now. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:13 am
In a follow-up to his highly popular “what drives partners nuts” post, in-house columnist (and former Biglaw partner) Mark Herrmann describes what drives associates crazy. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:13 am
In a follow-up to his highly popular “what drives partners nuts” post, in-house columnist (and former Biglaw partner) Mark Herrmann describes what drives associates crazy. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:40 pm
Our grandkids won't have a clue.In any event, Alison Bass' new book, Side Effects: A Prosecutor, A Whistleblower, and A Bestselling Antidepressant On Trial, severely criticizes a couple of players in the pharmaceutical industry.In his book review that appears on page A15 of today's Wall Street Journal, our own Herrmann explains that there are two sides to the antidepressant story, and Bass has told only one.That's why Herrmann had an adverse reaction to Side… [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Interested participants should send one document containing a 250-word paper abstract, a few sentences describing preferred delivery format (i.e., roundtable, abstract + presentation, etc.), and a short CV to Rachel Herrmann (HerrmannR@cardiff.ac.uk) by January 1st, 2019. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 5:46 am
Herrmann is a partner and litigator at a large firm. [read post]
11 May 2009, 5:50 am
Property owners are not liable for "really, really, really obvious" dangers under Minnesota law, the Court conceded, but Judge Kyle held that whether this danger was obvious, really obvious, really, really obvious, or really, really obvious is a question for a jury to decide (obviously).Herrmann v Continental Herrmann v Continental SJSLeventhal Publish at Scribd or explore others: Law … [read post]
