Search for: "pfeifer" Results 561 - 580 of 604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2014, 11:21 am by MBettman
By a vote of 4-3, in an opinion written by Justice O’Neill, for himself and Justices Pfeifer, French, and Kennedy, the Court held that unvested military retirement benefits earned during a marriage are marital assets subject to division in a divorce or dissolution. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:30 am by Bob Ambrogi
Last week, LexisNexis announced API partnerships with two notable legal tech companies, as part of what Jeff Pfeifer, chief product officer for Canada, the U.K., and the U.S., described as a step towards “creating a connected world” for legal professionals. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm by Matthew Streb
As Ohio Supreme Justice Paul Pfeifer once colorfully said, “I never felt so much like a hooker down by the bus station … as I did in a judicial race. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
This is the first part of a paper delivered at the JUSTICE/Sweet and Maxwell Human Rights conference on 20 October 2010. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 9:03 am by MBettman
On March 23, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Griffith v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:39 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices Pfeifer, O’Neill, Kennedy and French No: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices Lanzinger and O’Donnell Key Precedent R.C. 2711.10(D) (“In any of the following cases, the court of common pleas shall make an order vacating the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration if . . . [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:40 am by MBettman
The dissent, authored by Justice Pfeifer, however, argued the public-rights exception should apply because the case was of “great importance” to the public, based on the fact that three million Ohioans voted on the legislation at issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am by MBettman
On January 22, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am by MBettman
Should the rule of law be that the Cleveland police department can just go down the alley of each house pulling trash, and if they find evidence of drug residue in the trash behind some house, that is enough for a warrant, asked Justice Pfeifer, in his usual colorful style, adding, “why not just pick out a high crime area and start shopping? [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:54 am by MBettman
 Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices Pfeifer, French, Kennedy and O’Neill No: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices O’Donnell and Lanzinger. [read post]