Search for: "v. Holder et al" Results 561 - 580 of 921
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm by John Elwood
Jurisdictional Statement   Motion of Federal Election Commission to dismiss or affirm Opposition to motion to dismiss or affirm Amicus brief of Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights et al. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kali Borkoski
Amicus brief of Arkansas et al.Amicus brief of Alabama Forestry Association et al.Amicus brief of National Alliance of Forest Owners et al.Amicus brief of American Forest Resource Council et al. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on Mayo Collaborative Services, et al., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on Mayo Collaborative Services, et al., v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm by FDABlog HPM
Kappos et al., Case No. 2010-1534, perhaps starting (or ending) another chapter in the saga over a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) for U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:15 am by val_kimber
OF CA, ET AL. 10-879 KURNS, GLORIA G., ET AL. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:04 pm by Linda Atkins
These provisions of the so-called Municipal Water Law are among those recently upheld by the Washington Supreme Court against a constitutional challenge in Lummi Indian Nation et al v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:04 pm by Linda Atkins
These provisions of the so-called Municipal Water Law are among those recently upheld by the Washington Supreme Court against a constitutional challenge in Lummi Indian Nation et al v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
In 2001, the case of Golan et al v Holder was brought by a collection of plaintiffs, including orchestra conductors, educators, performers, motion picture distributors and publishers against the United States government alleging that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)- section 104A and 109 of the Copyright Act - is unconstitutional. [read post]