Search for: "v. JONES" Results 561 - 580 of 9,903
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am by Matrix Law
Jones v Birmingham City Council and another, heard 30th-31st January 2023. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
It is for that reason that a prof neg claim arising out of a PI claim does not qualify as a claim for personal injury for the purpose of QOCS, or indeed for any other purpose such as limitation; Jones v GR Smith & Co (8 February 1993, unreported, CA). (7) By r44.13(1)(c) QOCS does not apply to applications for pre-action disclosure. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones (1982): Fairness, Forty Years onPhilippa Collins (University of Bristol, UK)8. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 1999 Foxpace Limited (“Foxpace”), the Fourth Respondent, owned a property known as Nash House in London. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Nonprofit Blogger
Last week, House Democrats proposed a constitutional amendment (reprinted below) that would overrule Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am by Matrix Law
Also on Wednesday, the Court will hand down judgment in Barton and others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn–Jones (deceased), first heard on the 2nd November 2022. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:01 pm by Paul Caron
Rev. 1381 (2022): The Supreme Court held, in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 12:52 pm by Travis Walker and Imran Ahmad (CA)
Each of the representative plaintiffs raised claims based on the tort of intrusion upon seclusion that was first recognized by the Court of Appeal in Jones v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc). [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]