Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 7,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2009, 3:22 am
Roness v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:31 pm
In 2005, MGM v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm
Considering the 8-year legal battle that resulted in the settlement, the approval order – all 7 sentences of it – was anti-climactic. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:38 pm
Her detailed and closely reasoned 132-page opinion in Ashkenazy v Gindi addresses motions to dismiss a bevy of claims and counterclaims in a battle royal between two prominent real estate investors with high-priced lawyers involving co-ownership interests in properties located in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Montreal, and other locations. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:36 pm
& Mfrs. of Am. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:54 am
The seminal case on point is a U.S. decision, Bridgeman Art Library v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
This is not a machine v. human battle. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:39 am
Circuit’s ruling in the Jefferson case, known as USA v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm
Genex Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
As the decision of the AAR in Ikea Trading v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
The legislation requires services providers to register with the State Bar and pay a fee. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
Further, that an administration headed by two men who had "had other priorities" than to risk their own lives when their turn to fight for their country came up, should brand as a threat to the United States a person who did not run away but stood up and fought for his country and was wounded in battle, goes beyond the outrageous. [read post]
