Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 14,475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
According to the opinions of Justices in the majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:21 pm
On Monday, June 28, 2010, in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
The New York legislature passed the law, known as the Concealed Carry Improvement Act, just eight days after the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
But 2012 has produced two state supreme court decisions in this area of intellectual property law. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:59 pm
The rule is stated by Mr. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:00 am
”); Polk v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:34 pm
From an administrative law standpoint, this case is potentially significant because it could clarify the Court's demarcation in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:53 pm
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:27 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
— Phil Miles (@PhilipMiles) January 18, 2020 Day 100: #SCOTUS100 McDonald v City of Chicago - 14th Am Due Process Clause incorporates the 2nd Am right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:50 am
For example, the Supreme Court will decide whether the Second Amendment right to bear arms is incorporated (applied to state action) in McDonald v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
The ruling below, which upheld the state law, is reversed and remanded. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am
In determining whether the sworn juror is "grossly unqualified," the court must, "[i]n a probing and tactful inquiry, . . . evaluate the nature of what the juror has seen, heard, or has [*5]acquired knowledge of, and assess its importance and its bearing on the case" (People v Buford, 69 NY2d 290, 299 [1987]). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:03 pm
An Appellate Court ruling in the case of Health Care and Retirement Corporation of America v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 6:47 am
See Dresdner Bank A.G v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:17 am
In Thomas & Betts Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:46 pm
Supreme Court decided Vance v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 5:08 am
Article 15.1 of the Trade Mark Directive states that trademark rights are exhausted if the goods bearing the trademark have been put on the market in the EEA (European Economic Area) by trademark owners or with their consent. [read post]
