Search for: "Deal v. Deal" Results 5781 - 5800 of 38,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Hughes
Baig, because they deal with misrepresentation. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 am
IPKat focuses its lens on a decision  given last year [Merpel says: "it is never too late to inform IPKat readers"] by the UK High Court in Sprint Electric Ltd v Buyer’s Dream Ltd [2018] EWHC 1924 (Ch). [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:33 pm by INFORRM
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments  in the field. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:56 am by Eric Goldman
Strangely, this opinion doesn’t deal with these consent identity issues. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
A similar issue arose in Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 127. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 7:57 am
He's more about closing deals — Let the lawyers tend to the law stuff! [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:51 am by Madeleine Reardon, 1 Kings Bench Walk.
Finally, after the conclusion of the judgment, the Court added a ‘postscript’ expressing concern at the recent re-statement by the ECtHR in X v Latvia (App no 27853/09) that Hague Convention cases demanded an in-depth examination of the entire family situation (as initially expressed, controversially, in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122), and stating its conviction that such an in-depth examination is not required either by the terms of the Convention… [read post]