Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 8,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2013, 6:07 am
“Of and concerning” can be shown by proof either “(1) that the defendant intended the words to refer to the plaintiff and that they were so understood or (2) that persons could reasonably interpret the defendant's words to refer to the plaintiff and that the defendant was negligent in publishing them in such a way that they could be so understood. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am
” The court amplified its ruling as follows: Although plaintiff is not entitled to the “fair value” of the stock under Business Corporation Law § 1118 (b) because he does not own 20% of the outstanding shares and there is no evidence that defendant has engaged in “illegal, fraudulent or oppressive actions” toward plaintiff (§ 1104-a [a] [1]), it does not follow, as defendant suggests, that plaintiff is… [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
As a result, the Board held that an employer maintaining a policy against employees discussing ongoing investigations violates Section 8(a)(1). [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
This does not mean that the defendants are precluded from asserting defenses under Fed. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
March 1, 2013) (memorandum). [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:37 am
If the bill passes and is signed by the governor, it will take effect September 1, 2013. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm
Unfortunately, this does not always happen and without proper care, patients can suffer. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:27 am
Code § 1037(a)(1). [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:26 pm
(ii) For an Indian manufacturer, fighting a lawsuit in Delhi itself can be expensive but defending a lawsuit in California will be at least 20 to 30 times more expensive. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
Because of the objective nature of the test in subsection (1), the issuing authority may be satisfied on the balance of probabilities as to the reasonable grounds even if the protected person denies, or does not give evidence about, fearing the commission of domestic violence. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 12:49 pm
The discovery that had already occurred had required defendants to preserve 5 terabytes of data inside roughly a half-million folders covering almost a 20-year period and 89 custodians. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Mobileye sued defendants (iOnRoad) for various claims. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
CS # 1 and CS # 2 [said] the supplier of the marijuana . . . seized in earlier warrants was named `Edwin’. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:46 am
Defendants moved to dismiss. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:13 pm
Does AF Holdings make a lot of money? [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
John Does 1–10, No. 2:12-cv-01642-RGK-SSx, slip op. at 4 (C.D. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Id., Pg. 20, Para. 39. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
The fact that there was thought to be a wider ‘scandal’ does not alter the position. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:57 am
On June 8, 2005, the Caplins amended their complaint to add the following H-W students and their parents as defendants: (1) the Ryans and their son; (2) the Angelichs and their son; (3) the Ferreros and their son; (4) the Soleys and their son; (5) the Carleys and their son; (6) the Shapiros and their son; (7) H-W Does 1 through 50; (8) student Does 1 through 50; and (9) parent Does 1 through 100. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
In writing my testimony for today’s House Judiciary Committee hearing on drones and targeted killing of U.S. citizens overseas, I found myself writing a more complete explication of the essential legal rationale underlying the administration’s position on the subject than I have, to date, set down in one place. [read post]
