Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm
A-S v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 564 (Admin) (17 January 2011): Bizarre “catch-22? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm
The consultation paper is extremely focused on English law. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
I’ve recently started working on a book about reformers’ ideologies and strategies in Sheff v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
More significantly, the qualified privilege set out in Part 2 currently only applies to publications arising in UK and EU member states. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:21 pm
Justice Aftab AlamIn a recent decision, the Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra v M/s Ark Builders Pvt. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd Tugendhat J had stated that whatever definition of what is defamatory was adopted, ‘it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims’. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm
Parallel Networks v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
In its order, in identifying the parameters it utilized to resolve the parents’ school placement dispute, the trial court stated that “education is by its nature an exploration and examination of new things,” and that “a child requires academic, social, cultural, and physical interaction with a variety of experiences, people, concepts, and surroundings in order to grow to an adult who can make intelligent decisions about how to achieve a productive and satisfying… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
English) influence. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:11 am
For example, let’s start off with Milner v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
See Rosalind English’s post about the decision. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 2:45 pm
The next February, Griffin v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
And this brings us to the second relationship in the English story: the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and English High Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in Aruna Shanbaug v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm
In Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 2:30 am
This explains why in VIRBAC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
Viacom International Inc., v. [read post]
