Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 9,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
See State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:13 pm
In mid-March, the Court granted certiorari in Negusie v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
Clarke v Meadus [2010] EWHC 3117 (Ch) Normally Dave would be covering this kind of case, knowing more about equity and trust right now than I probably ever will. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
Clarke v Meadus [2010] EWHC 3117 (Ch) Normally Dave would be covering this kind of case, knowing more about equity and trust right now than I probably ever will. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
We now know that “in order to find the rules of the English law of breach of confidence we now have to look in the jurisprudence of articles 8 and 10” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
Martin Illmer: “Anti-suit injunctions zur Durchsetzung von Schiedsvereinbarungen in Europa - der letzte Vorhang ist gefallen” – the English abstract reads as follows: Yet another blow for the English: the final curtain for anti-suit injunctions to enforce arbitration agreements within the European Union has fallen. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm
” Mr Justice LeBlanc, delivering judgment also considered the principles set out by the Canadian Supreme Court in Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 and R v Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442 (“the Dagenais/Mentuck test”), namely that a request for a publication ban may be ordered when: (a) such an order is necessary in order to prevent a serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonably alternative measures… [read post]
[UPCKat] Revisiting lessons from the first ex parte UPC preliminary injunction in myStromer v Revolt
7 Aug 2024, 6:33 am
It obtained the first UPC ex parte injunction (see the English translation here) against Revolt Zycling, followed by the first UPC penalty payment (see here) for not complying with that injunction. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 8:42 pm
The question in R v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
This follows his earlier judgment in Teva v Novartis ([2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat)). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:02 am
Moreover, in a subsequent decision, English v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
The new Circuit Court order came in a series of 21 cases (the lead case is Abdah v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:40 pm
That notion is plainly contradicted by Harlow [v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
To the extent Trump v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Coln v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
” Wyoming v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
In requesting that the Panel terminate the UDRP proceeding it contended that the domain name is composed of a common English word. [read post]
