Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 11,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
" Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 (5 June 2009) Related posts:Ontario: Jurisdiction and Family Law In Okmyansky v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am
The 2004 Directive was implemented into English law by the Immigration EEA Regulations 2006 (“EEA Regulations“). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 12:41 pm
Stanford student JP Schnapper-Casteras discusses oral argument in Boyle v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Sheeran v Chokri Part 2: Admission of similar fact evidence | New Year, Same Creative Authorship Requirement in US Copyright | Reader discount for IPKat book award titles! [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:31 pm
: G 1/18, the decision | Coloplast v Salts: Should UK infringement proceedings be stayed if the patent has been opposed? [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
Glucksberg, Timbs v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 pm
II) Transparency v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
BREAKING: Eli Lilly success as UK Supreme Court finds Actavis products directly and indirectly infringe pemetrexed patentThe on-going saga between Eli Lilly and Actavis regarding Lilly's pemetrexed disodium product has kept the English courts busy for years. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 2:02 am
Qualcomm and Apple v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am
In Buck v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
Comm. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
Justice Birss’s rulings in Varian Medical Systems AG v (1) Elekta Limited; and (2) Elekta Holdings Limited [2016] EWHC 2679 (Pat) cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
This is contrary to the normal position under English law that once final relief is granted, parties are not entitled to come back to court. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:27 pm
Sparhawk v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm
Other countries’ FoI laws, such as the English and Scottish laws recognize two types of exemptions: absolute and relative. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
