Search for: "HOWE v. STATE" Results 5781 - 5800 of 80,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 2:38 pm by Kim Krawiec
Barak’s recent paper on the “rabbinic cartels” reminded me that I wanted to provide some updates on Kamakahi v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
” (iv) Financial Independence and s 117B(3) Characterising Ms Rhuppiah’s case as “a good example of the sometimes flimsy distinction between employment and third party support”, Lord Wilson took the view that “financial independence” in s 117B(3) means an absence of financial dependence upon the state. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 12:26 pm by Eric Goldman
” The court explains that the reports “require a company to recast its content-moderation practices in language prescribed by the State, implicitly opining on whether and how certain controversial categories of content should be moderated. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am by INFORRM
In the first part of this series, we considered how the ECHR has expanded the scope of article 8 rights, beyond the “new strength and breadth” which Lord Woolf had predicted in 2002 (in A v B) that the mis-named action for “disclosure of confidential information which would infringe privacy” would have. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am by Eric Goldman
As an aside, just how lucrative is the whale watching industry that it can support a $1.5M lawsuit between competitors? [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:25 pm
  Though I wonder what the informal "cap" would be on how much work a state supreme court would do for the Ninth Circuit before it stopped doing stuff for 'em. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
  Here is how the opinion starts:Having interpreted this court's precedents as virtually foreclosing variances from the United States Sentencing Guidelines, the district court imposed a sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in Bucklew v. [read post]