Search for: "Holmes"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 6,311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
"Holme, Roberts & Owen LLP write:"The decision, although one by only a single federal district court in the Western District of Washington, is nonetheless an important ruling for the buyout industry which has been targeted with antitrust suits around the country after the Department of Justice opened an inquiry into possible anticompetitive conduct related to club deals in 2006. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
March 3, 2008 - March 7, 2008 To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 9:24 pm
But contracts are, as Holmes put it, promises to perform or pay damages. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
Story IMPACT, the blog from law firm Freeth Cartwright, has a very useful article : Memory trick shows that encryption isn’t the answer to data security Nick Holmes of Binary Law has a useful note to a link on “Legal profession on the brink” Ruthie, of Ruthie’s Law, busy with a four week trial, has posted about Court Dress. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 1:58 am
Unfortunately, it's hardly been updated since then, and a page on the blog aggregating feeds from other family law blogs has been 'beaten to it' by Nick Holmes' Family Law Pipe. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 8:00 pm
Brit Nick Holmes at Binary Law has always had a good eye for new things on both sides of the Atlantic. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:59 am
"Short of removing the parolees, Carson City Councilwoman Lula Davis-Holmes (Email) asked the hotel general manager if he would post a sign alerting patrons that sex offenders are staying there. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:25 pm
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to deduce Colbert's character is based (almost entirely) on Bill O'Reilly. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:26 pm
Holmes, now at CNN. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:02 am
See Holmes v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 3:46 pm
In "The Path of the Law," for example, Holmes asserts that "pretty nearly the whole meaning of every new effort of legal thought is to make [our] prophesies [of what courts will do] more precise, and to generalize then into a thoroughly connected system. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:47 pm
Sargent, Carleton University (Department of Law), Ottawa, Canada "Truth, Justice and Method: The Representation of Rationality in the Fictional Worlds of Sherlock Holmes and Sam Spade"Third Panel: Rights, Power & Resistance, Panel Chair: Allison Pease, John Jay College of Criminal Justice (Room 630)Monica Lott, The University of Akron, "Funeral Practices of the 1930s and the Resultant Power Structures as Reflected in The Grapes of Wrath" Chris Brown, University… [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:05 pm
Saturday: Judge Holmes Presents Why Tax Regulation Is Good at Mugel Tax Moot Court Competition The Global Flat Tax Revolution: Lessons for Policy Makers Tittle & Avi-Yonah on The Integrated 2006 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
These companies had merged to become another defendant, Hooper Evaluations, in 2006, and are owned by Hooper Holmes, Inc. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 11:13 am
Tax Court Judge Mark Holmes gives a luncheon address on Why Tax Regulation Is Good. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:27 pm
A unanimous court eventually broadened the ability of death-penalty defendants to blame someone else for the crime.That was Holmes v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 3:35 am
Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson were going camping. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:04 pm
Cucuzzella spoke to the nurse, she expected to receive counseling help for her marital situation.In other poetic allusion, Judge Baker wrote:Learned Hand and Oliver Wendell Holmes both noted that the common law moves with small currents, but through its collective motion, one might well look up to find oneself far from the intended textual and legal shore. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 10:04 pm
This principle underlies three standards which offer both a better explanation of the Court's past section 1331 cases and better guides for future decisions than the Holmes test. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 3:58 am
Thanks to Mark P for noticing that Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond is going to the House of Lords. [read post]
