Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 5,815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2006, 8:56 pm
Katchman, Steven B. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 4:01 pm
S B Cheek you have permission to reprint this. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 11:27 pm
Security was able to restore some semblance of order after just a few minutes, though I have to say the screaming sometimes made it hard to concentrate on what was being said.Other stars of the Supreme Court bar who shared stories and advice with us included Donald Ayer, Virginia Seitz, Carter Phillips, Michael J. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 9:31 am
" in 7-Eleven Inc., MDK Corp., C & J Realty, LP, and ENSR Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 10:11 pm
On November 21, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in Sandra J. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 8:11 am
Finding that this is a matter best left to the legislature and that nothing in statutory or constitutional law requires a trial court to pay for an interpreter for a defendant who has not established financial need, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. * * * CRONE, J., concurs. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:45 am
The Court's statement that a finding of descriptiveness or of lack of distinctiveness requires a description of the "intended purpose" of the goods and services in question is erroneous as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 10:01 am
SULLIVAN, J., and ROBB, J., concur. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 9:16 am
Morris B. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 1:29 am
The Office and Biofarma, on the other hand, take the view that the perception of patients matters too. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 10:52 pm
"b) "Are you kidding? [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 12:33 am
(b) What are the key characteristics of the method of doing business exclusion? [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:46 pm
Allergan disagreed, arguing that, since the original application referred to the neurotoxin component in the technical background to the invention, the matter had been sufficiently disclosed, both explicitly and implicitly, by the original application.Kitchin J allowed Merz's claim and ruled that the BOTOX patent was invalid. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 8:18 am
At least in the Second Circuit, equitable estoppel may provide the most powerful defense.To purchase the Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 2006), please go here and use OFFER NUMBER 523571.Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 2006) by Raymond J. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Barbara Healy Smith, with whom Michael J. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
Their abstracted summaries follow: *** UNLV's Nancy B. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
. *** ATC, LLC d/b/a ATC of Nevada (28-CA-20076, 20197; 348 NLRB No. 43) Las Vegas, NV Sept. 29, 2006. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 3:04 pm
-Garry J. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
It denied the General Counsel's motion as to Paragraphs 25-26, 30-31, 34(b), 83-84; and Appendixes G-J and CC-DD. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
I've read through Jose Padilla's motion (written by the Federal Defender's Office -- Michael Caruso, Orlando do Campo, and Tony Natale) to dismiss for outrageous government conduct, which I originally covered last week here. [read post]
