Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 5781 - 5800 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Matter of Garza-Olivares, 26 I&N Dec. 736 (BIA 2016) - The Board provided a rubric for how to analyze state and federal crimes in the context of whether they constitute an offense described in INA § 101(a)(43)(T)(aggravated felony crime of failing to appear). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Matter of Garza-Olivares, 26 I&N Dec. 736 (BIA 2016) - The Board provided a rubric for how to analyze state and federal crimes in the context of whether they constitute an offense described in INA § 101(a)(43)(T)(aggravated felony crime of failing to appear). [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:29 pm by Unknown
E-bikes don’t have their own standard except for 16 CFR 1512, provided they meet the 20 mph requirement in the standard; if they don't, well then there are other issues to deal with. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:54 am by Susan Brenner
Code §§2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2)”, Christopher Schlingloff moved to suppress the evidence found on “his laptop and external storage device. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 9:13 am by Daniel Shaviro
But it is subject to tax competition for mobile resources, even if countries aren't interacting strategically. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:36 am by Mark Tushnet
I myself don't find these arguments particularly strong, but that -- on the CLS view -- doesn't mean anything about what constitutional law on this matter "really" is. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:40 pm by Kevin Funnell
I suppose I'd be more sympathetic to banks that complain about plaintiffs who cruise bank branches, seeking ATMs that don't post the signs required by the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, and then sue banks for violating that particular requirement portion of the EFTA, if (A) the law hadn't been around for a decade and/or (B) plaintiffs or their attorneys were ripping off the signs when no one was looking, then suing the bank for not having a sign. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 6:33 pm
  Of course, none of this may matter if rumors are to be believed. [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:33 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Roberts, Esq., Employment Law Counsel Subject Matter Expert CalChamber members can read more about Private Retirement Savings Plans in the HR Library. [read post]
19 May 2008, 4:24 am
I don't think she should continue to sit as a recorder. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:09 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
       It doesn’t matter if I’m a couple of days late, right? [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm by NL
This would be the case, by virtue of s.88(1)(b) even if the ‘successor’ joint tenant didn’t otherwise fall within the definition of those who can succeed (partner, family member) in s.89.But where 88(1)(b) deals with succession by a joint tenant, s.88(1)(a) refers to succession as provided for in s.89. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm by NL
This would be the case, by virtue of s.88(1)(b) even if the ‘successor’ joint tenant didn’t otherwise fall within the definition of those who can succeed (partner, family member) in s.89.But where 88(1)(b) deals with succession by a joint tenant, s.88(1)(a) refers to succession as provided for in s.89. [read post]